Which act constitutes an offense under cockfighting statutes by causing one animal to fight with another when either is not a dog?

• A. Causes two dogs to fight
• B. Causes one animal to fight with another animal, if either animal is not a dog
• C. Attends cockfighting as spectator
• D. Owns or trains a cock

Answer: (B)

Cockfighting statutes focus on actively causing animals to fight, and they cover situations where a non-dog animal is involved to address fights beyond traditional dogfighting. The statement that describes causing one animal to fight with another when either is not a dog fits this scope, because it targets inciting a fight that includes at least one non-dog species (such as a rooster fighting another animal). The other options describe different conduct not matching that specific act: forcing two dogs to fight aligns with dogfighting rather than cockfighting; attending as a spectator is not about causing a fight; owning or training a cock relates to possession or preparation rather than the act of causing a fight.